|
|
Post by Kofi on Nov 9, 2006 23:32:36 GMT -5
...to "catch-up" with FS2004....    
|
|
|
|
Post by scubakobe on Nov 10, 2006 0:11:26 GMT -5
The shots look great, I like the fog in the first picture. How much money did you spend on add-ons to get those results though? Honestly, I would want to buy FS-X to save myself the time of adding in other products and buying/downloading them. That's not the case right now though, as of now I am trying to get it to run smoothly...  Ok.. so 50/50...  |
|
|
|
Post by foxwolfen on Nov 10, 2006 1:03:19 GMT -5
The problem is FSX will require the some level or expense to make look as good Kobbe  |
|
|
|
Post by Kofi on Nov 10, 2006 1:36:49 GMT -5
The shots look great, I like the fog in the first picture. How much money did you spend on add-ons to get those results though?
However....
I liked FS2004 "out of the box"..... |
|
|
|
Post by windrunner on Nov 10, 2006 4:37:59 GMT -5
It's a long way to Tipperary....... ;D
It's a long way to Tipperary,
It's a long way to go.
It's a long way to Tipperary
To the sweetest girl I know!
Goodbye Piccadilly,
Farewell Leicester Square,
It's a long long way to Tipperary,
But my heart's right there.
It's a long way to Tipperary,
It's a long way to go.
It's a long way to Tipperary
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Post by lifejogger on Nov 10, 2006 8:12:12 GMT -5
Kofi,
I have to agree with you!!!!! It will take a huge amount of changes in FSX for it to ever look as good as your screen shots.
|
|
